mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Comparison of Deep Learning and the Classical Machine Learning Algorithm for the Malware Detection

arXiv 1809.05889 ↗First posted 16 Sep 2018cs.CR cs.AI cs.LGcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recently, Deep Learning has been showing promising results in various Artificial Intelligence applications like image recognition, natural language processing, language modeling, neural machine translation, etc. Although, in general, it is computationally more expensive as compared to classical machine learning techniques, their results are found to be more effective in some cases. Therefore, in this paper, we investigated and compared one of the Deep Learning Architecture called Deep Neural Network (DNN) with the classical Random Forest (RF) machine learning algorithm for the malware classification. We studied the performance of the classical RF and DNN with 2, 4 & 7 layers architectures with the four different feature sets, and found that irrespective of the features inputs, the classical RF accuracy outperforms the DNN.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 16 Sep 2018.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 5.

5 papers.