Geodesic Clustering in Deep Generative Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Deep generative models are tremendously successful in learning low-dimensional latent representations that well-describe the data. These representations, however, tend to much distort relationships between points, i.e. pairwise distances tend to not reflect semantic similarities well. This renders unsupervised tasks, such as clustering, difficult when working with the latent representations. We demonstrate that taking the geometry of the generative model into account is sufficient to make simple clustering algorithms work well over latent representations. Leaning on the recent finding that deep generative models constitute stochastically immersed Riemannian manifolds, we propose an efficient algorithm for computing geodesics (shortest paths) and computing distances in the latent space, while taking its distortion into account. We further propose a new architecture for modeling uncertainty in variational autoencoders, which is essential for understanding the geometry of deep generative models. Experiments show that the geodesic distance is very likely to reflect the internal structure of the data.
Key facts. Cited by 14 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 13 Sep 2018.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 5; 2022: 2; 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 5.
14 papers.
Sort:
By area:
- 2021Pulling back information geometrycited by 23
- 2021A prior-based approximate latent Riemannian metriccited by 11
- 2021Exploring the Latent Space of Autoencoders with Interventional Assayscited by 10
- 2021On Linear Interpolation in the Latent Space of Deep Generative Modelscited by 8
- 2023RDA-INR: Riemannian Diffeomorphic Autoencoding via Implicit Neural Representationscited by 7
- 2024Decoder ensembling for learned latent geometriescited by 6
- 2022Adversarial robustness of VAEs through the lens of local geometrycited by 4
- 2025Connecting Neural Models Latent Geometries with Relative Geodesic Representationscited by 4
- 2025Using the Path of Least Resistance to Explain Deep Networkscited by 3
- 2025Learning Geometry and Topology via Multi-Chart Flowscited by 3
- 2021Training Deep Normalizing Flow Models in Highly Incomplete Data Scenarios with Prior Regularizationcited by 1
- 2025Be Tangential to Manifold: Discovering Riemannian Metric for Diffusion Modelscited by 1
- 2025Be Tangential to Manifold: Discovering Riemannian Metric for Diffusion Models7 Oct 2025
- 2025Geometric Embedding Alignment via Curvature Matching in Transfer Learning16 Jun 2025
- 2025Connecting Neural Models Latent Geometries with Relative Geodesic Representations2 Jun 2025
- 2025Learning Geometry and Topology via Multi-Chart Flows30 May 2025
- 2025Using the Path of Least Resistance to Explain Deep Networks17 Feb 2025
- 2024Decoder ensembling for learned latent geometries14 Aug 2024
- 2023RDA-INR: Riemannian Diffeomorphic Autoencoding via Implicit Neural Representations22 May 2023
- 2022Adversarial robustness of VAEs through the lens of local geometry8 Aug 2022
- 2022Discriminating Against Unrealistic Interpolations in Generative Adversarial Networks2 Mar 2022
- 2021Exploring the Latent Space of Autoencoders with Interventional Assays30 Jun 2021
- 2021Pulling back information geometry9 Jun 2021
- 2021On Linear Interpolation in the Latent Space of Deep Generative Models8 May 2021
- 2021Pulling back information geometrycited by 23
- 2021A prior-based approximate latent Riemannian metriccited by 11
- 2021Exploring the Latent Space of Autoencoders with Interventional Assayscited by 10
- 2021On Linear Interpolation in the Latent Space of Deep Generative Modelscited by 8
- 2023RDA-INR: Riemannian Diffeomorphic Autoencoding via Implicit Neural Representationscited by 7
- 2024Decoder ensembling for learned latent geometriescited by 6
- 2022Adversarial robustness of VAEs through the lens of local geometrycited by 4
- 2025Connecting Neural Models Latent Geometries with Relative Geodesic Representationscited by 4
- 2025Using the Path of Least Resistance to Explain Deep Networkscited by 3
- 2025Learning Geometry and Topology via Multi-Chart Flowscited by 3
- 2021Training Deep Normalizing Flow Models in Highly Incomplete Data Scenarios with Prior Regularizationcited by 1
- 2022Discriminating Against Unrealistic Interpolations in Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 0
12 most cited of 13 All 13 (JSON)
- 2025Geometric Embedding Alignment via Curvature Matching in Transfer Learning16 Jun 2025
- 2025Connecting Neural Models Latent Geometries with Relative Geodesic Representations2 Jun 2025
- 2025Learning Geometry and Topology via Multi-Chart Flows30 May 2025
- 2025Using the Path of Least Resistance to Explain Deep Networks17 Feb 2025
- 2024Decoder ensembling for learned latent geometries14 Aug 2024
- 2023RDA-INR: Riemannian Diffeomorphic Autoencoding via Implicit Neural Representations22 May 2023
- 2022Adversarial robustness of VAEs through the lens of local geometry8 Aug 2022
- 2022Discriminating Against Unrealistic Interpolations in Generative Adversarial Networks2 Mar 2022
- 2021Exploring the Latent Space of Autoencoders with Interventional Assays30 Jun 2021
- 2021Pulling back information geometry9 Jun 2021
- 2021On Linear Interpolation in the Latent Space of Deep Generative Models8 May 2021
- 2021Training Deep Normalizing Flow Models in Highly Incomplete Data Scenarios with Prior Regularization3 Apr 2021
12 newest of 13 All 13 (JSON)