mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Benchmarking and Optimization of Gradient Boosting Decision Tree Algorithms

arXiv 1809.04559 ↗First posted 12 Sep 2018cs.LG stat.MLcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Gradient boosting decision trees (GBDTs) have seen widespread adoption in academia, industry and competitive data science due to their state-of-the-art performance in many machine learning tasks. One relative downside to these models is the large number of hyper-parameters that they expose to the end-user. To maximize the predictive power of GBDT models, one must either manually tune the hyper-parameters, or utilize automated techniques such as those based on Bayesian optimization. Both of these approaches are time-consuming since they involve repeatably training the model for different sets of hyper-parameters. A number of software GBDT packages have started to offer GPU acceleration which can help to alleviate this problem. In this paper, we consider three such packages: XGBoost, LightGBM and Catboost. Firstly, we evaluate the performance of the GPU acceleration provided by these packages using large-scale datasets with varying shapes, sparsities and learning tasks. Then, we compare the packages in the context of hyper-parameter optimization, both in terms of how quickly each package converges to a good validation score, and in terms of generalization performance.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 12 Sep 2018.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 0; 2025: 2.

7 papers.