Identifying Unmaintained Projects in GitHub
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Background: Open source software has an increasing importance in modern software development. However, there is also a growing concern on the sustainability of such projects, which are usually managed by a small number of developers, frequently working as volunteers. Aims: In this paper, we propose an approach to identify GitHub projects that are not actively maintained. Our goal is to alert users about the risks of using these projects and possibly motivate other developers to assume the maintenance of the projects. Method: We train machine learning models to identify unmaintained or sparsely maintained projects, based on a set of features about project activity (commits, forks, issues, etc). We empirically validate the model with the best performance with the principal developers of 129 GitHub projects. Results: The proposed machine learning approach has a precision of 80%, based on the feedback of real open source developers; and a recall of 96%. We also show that our approach can be used to assess the risks of projects becoming unmaintained. Conclusions: The model proposed in this paper can be used by open source users and developers to identify GitHub projects that are not actively maintained anymore.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 11 Sep 2018.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 0; 2026: 2.
5 papers.
- 2022Automatic Analysis of Available Source Code of Top Artificial Intelligence Conference Paperscited by 9
- 2021A framework for fostering transparency in shared artificial intelligence models by increasing visibility of contributionscited by 5
- 2026Human-AI Synergy in Agentic Code Reviewcited by 3
- 2023Detecting Security Patches via Behavioral Data in Code Repositoriescited by 0
- 2026From Human-Centric to Agentic Code Review: The Impact of Different Generations of Generative AI Technology on Review Qualitycited by 0
- 2026From Human-Centric to Agentic Code Review: The Impact of Different Generations of Generative AI Technology on Review Quality14 Jul 2026
- 2026Human-AI Synergy in Agentic Code Review16 Mar 2026
- 2023Detecting Security Patches via Behavioral Data in Code Repositories4 Feb 2023
- 2022Automatic Analysis of Available Source Code of Top Artificial Intelligence Conference Papers28 Sep 2022
- 2021A framework for fostering transparency in shared artificial intelligence models by increasing visibility of contributions5 Mar 2021