Assessing and Addressing Algorithmic Bias - But Before We Get There
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Algorithmic and data bias are gaining attention as a pressing issue in popular press - and rightly so. However, beyond these calls to action, standard processes and tools for practitioners do not readily exist to assess and address unfair algorithmic and data biases. The literature is relatively scattered and the needed interdisciplinary approach means that very different communities are working on the topic. We here provide a number of challenges encountered in assessing and addressing algorithmic and data bias in practice. We describe an early approach that attempts to translate the literature into processes for (production) teams wanting to assess both intended data and algorithm characteristics and unintended, unfair biases.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 10 Sep 2018.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.
4 papers.
- 2022Debiasing Methods for Fairer Neural Models in Vision and Language Research: A Surveycited by 22
- 2021A Framework for Fairness: A Systematic Review of Existing Fair AI Solutionscited by 18
- 2023Ethical Considerations for Responsible Data Curationcited by 17
- 2025Fairness-in-the-Workflow: How Machine Learning Practitioners at Big Tech Companies Approach Fairness in Recommender Systemscited by 0
- 2025Fairness-in-the-Workflow: How Machine Learning Practitioners at Big Tech Companies Approach Fairness in Recommender Systems26 May 2025
- 2023Ethical Considerations for Responsible Data Curation7 Feb 2023
- 2022Debiasing Methods for Fairer Neural Models in Vision and Language Research: A Survey10 Nov 2022
- 2021A Framework for Fairness: A Systematic Review of Existing Fair AI Solutions10 Dec 2021