Greedy Search with Probabilistic N-gram Matching for Neural Machine Translation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Neural machine translation (NMT) models are usually trained with the word-level loss using the teacher forcing algorithm, which not only evaluates the translation improperly but also suffers from exposure bias. Sequence-level training under the reinforcement framework can mitigate the problems of the word-level loss, but its performance is unstable due to the high variance of the gradient estimation. On these grounds, we present a method with a differentiable sequence-level training objective based on probabilistic n-gram matching which can avoid the reinforcement framework. In addition, this method performs greedy search in the training which uses the predicted words as context just as at inference to alleviate the problem of exposure bias. Experiment results on the NIST Chinese-to-English translation tasks show that our method significantly outperforms the reinforcement-based algorithms and achieves an improvement of 1.5 BLEU points on average over a strong baseline system.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 10 Sep 2018.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 4; 2022: 3; 2023: 1; 2024: 1.
9 papers.
- 2022One Reference Is Not Enough: Diverse Distillation with Reference Selection for Non-Autoregressive Translationcited by 20
- 2021Sequence-Level Training for Non-Autoregressive Neural Machine Translationcited by 18
- 2021Don't Take It Literally: An Edit-Invariant Sequence Loss for Text Generationcited by 17
- 2022Non-Monotonic Latent Alignments for CTC-Based Non-Autoregressive Machine Translationcited by 16
- 2021Guiding Teacher Forcing with Seer Forcing for Neural Machine Translationcited by 8
- 2021Adaptive Bridge between Training and Inference for Dialoguecited by 5
- 2024N-gram Prediction and Word Difference Representations for Language Modelingcited by 3
- 2022Differentiable N-gram Objective on Abstractive Summarizationcited by 2
- 2023N-Gram Nearest Neighbor Machine Translationcited by 1
- 2024N-gram Prediction and Word Difference Representations for Language Modeling5 Sep 2024
- 2023N-Gram Nearest Neighbor Machine Translation30 Jan 2023
- 2022Non-Monotonic Latent Alignments for CTC-Based Non-Autoregressive Machine Translation8 Oct 2022
- 2022One Reference Is Not Enough: Diverse Distillation with Reference Selection for Non-Autoregressive Translation28 May 2022
- 2022Differentiable N-gram Objective on Abstractive Summarization8 Feb 2022
- 2021Adaptive Bridge between Training and Inference for Dialogue22 Oct 2021
- 2021Don't Take It Literally: An Edit-Invariant Sequence Loss for Text Generation29 Jun 2021
- 2021Sequence-Level Training for Non-Autoregressive Neural Machine Translation15 Jun 2021
- 2021Guiding Teacher Forcing with Seer Forcing for Neural Machine Translation12 Jun 2021