BPE and CharCNNs for Translation of Morphology: A Cross-Lingual Comparison and Analysis
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Neural Machine Translation (NMT) in low-resource settings and of morphologically rich languages is made difficult in part by data sparsity of vocabulary words. Several methods have been used to help reduce this sparsity, notably Byte-Pair Encoding (BPE) and a character-based CNN layer (charCNN). However, the charCNN has largely been neglected, possibly because it has only been compared to BPE rather than combined with it. We argue for a reconsideration of the charCNN, based on cross-lingual improvements on low-resource data. We translate from 8 languages into English, using a multi-way parallel collection of TED transcripts. We find that in most cases, using both BPE and a charCNN performs best, while in Hebrew, using a charCNN over words is best.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 5 Sep 2018.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 0; 2023: 0; 2024: 1.
4 papers.
- 2021Between words and characters: A Brief History of Open-Vocabulary Modeling and Tokenization in NLPcited by 130
- 2021Robust Open-Vocabulary Translation from Visual Text Representationscited by 47
- 2021Evaluating Various Tokenizers for Arabic Text Classificationcited by 14
- 2024Analyzing Byte-Pair Encoding on Monophonic and Polyphonic Symbolic Music: A Focus on Musical Phrase Segmentationcited by 0
- 2024Analyzing Byte-Pair Encoding on Monophonic and Polyphonic Symbolic Music: A Focus on Musical Phrase Segmentation2 Oct 2024
- 2021Between words and characters: A Brief History of Open-Vocabulary Modeling and Tokenization in NLP20 Dec 2021
- 2021Evaluating Various Tokenizers for Arabic Text Classification14 Jun 2021
- 2021Robust Open-Vocabulary Translation from Visual Text Representations16 Apr 2021