mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

BPE and CharCNNs for Translation of Morphology: A Cross-Lingual Comparison and Analysis

arXiv 1809.01301 ↗First posted 5 Sep 2018cs.CLcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Neural Machine Translation (NMT) in low-resource settings and of morphologically rich languages is made difficult in part by data sparsity of vocabulary words. Several methods have been used to help reduce this sparsity, notably Byte-Pair Encoding (BPE) and a character-based CNN layer (charCNN). However, the charCNN has largely been neglected, possibly because it has only been compared to BPE rather than combined with it. We argue for a reconsideration of the charCNN, based on cross-lingual improvements on low-resource data. We translate from 8 languages into English, using a multi-way parallel collection of TED transcripts. We find that in most cases, using both BPE and a charCNN performs best, while in Hebrew, using a charCNN over words is best.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 5 Sep 2018.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 0; 2023: 0; 2024: 1.

4 papers.