Comparative Studies of Detecting Abusive Language on Twitter
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The context-dependent nature of online aggression makes annotating large collections of data extremely difficult. Previously studied datasets in abusive language detection have been insufficient in size to efficiently train deep learning models. Recently, Hate and Abusive Speech on Twitter, a dataset much greater in size and reliability, has been released. However, this dataset has not been comprehensively studied to its potential. In this paper, we conduct the first comparative study of various learning models on Hate and Abusive Speech on Twitter, and discuss the possibility of using additional features and context data for improvements. Experimental results show that bidirectional GRU networks trained on word-level features, with Latent Topic Clustering modules, is the most accurate model scoring 0.805 F1.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 30 Aug 2018.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 7; 2022: 1; 2023: 1.
9 papers.
- 2021Towards generalisable hate speech detection: a review on obstacles and solutionscited by 66
- 2021Abuse is Contextual, What about NLP? The Role of Context in Abusive Language Annotation and Detectioncited by 19
- 2021Hopeful_Men@LT-EDI-EACL2021: Hope Speech Detection Using Indic Transliteration and Transformerscited by 1
- 2021MIPT-NSU-UTMN at SemEval-2021 Task 5: Ensembling Learning with Pre-trained Language Models for Toxic Spans Detectioncited by 1
- 2021LaDiff ULMFiT: A Layer Differentiated training approach for ULMFiTcited by 0
- 2021Improving Automatic Hate Speech Detection with Multiword Expression Featurescited by 0
- 2021How Do Pedophiles Tweet? Investigating the Writing Styles and Online Personas of Child Cybersex Traffickers in the Philippinescited by 0
- 2022Transferring Knowledge via Neighborhood-Aware Optimal Transport for Low-Resource Hate Speech Detectioncited by 0
- 2023Textual Toxicity in Social Media: Understanding the Bangla Toxic Language Expressed in Facebook Commentcited by 0
- 2023Textual Toxicity in Social Media: Understanding the Bangla Toxic Language Expressed in Facebook Comment9 Dec 2023
- 2022Transferring Knowledge via Neighborhood-Aware Optimal Transport for Low-Resource Hate Speech Detection17 Oct 2022
- 2021How Do Pedophiles Tweet? Investigating the Writing Styles and Online Personas of Child Cybersex Traffickers in the Philippines21 Jul 2021
- 2021Improving Automatic Hate Speech Detection with Multiword Expression Features1 Jun 2021
- 2021MIPT-NSU-UTMN at SemEval-2021 Task 5: Ensembling Learning with Pre-trained Language Models for Toxic Spans Detection10 Apr 2021
- 2021Abuse is Contextual, What about NLP? The Role of Context in Abusive Language Annotation and Detection27 Mar 2021
- 2021Hopeful_Men@LT-EDI-EACL2021: Hope Speech Detection Using Indic Transliteration and Transformers24 Feb 2021
- 2021Towards generalisable hate speech detection: a review on obstacles and solutions17 Feb 2021
- 2021LaDiff ULMFiT: A Layer Differentiated training approach for ULMFiT13 Jan 2021