mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Comparative Studies of Detecting Abusive Language on Twitter

arXiv 1808.10245 ↗First posted 30 Aug 2018cs.CLcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The context-dependent nature of online aggression makes annotating large collections of data extremely difficult. Previously studied datasets in abusive language detection have been insufficient in size to efficiently train deep learning models. Recently, Hate and Abusive Speech on Twitter, a dataset much greater in size and reliability, has been released. However, this dataset has not been comprehensively studied to its potential. In this paper, we conduct the first comparative study of various learning models on Hate and Abusive Speech on Twitter, and discuss the possibility of using additional features and context data for improvements. Experimental results show that bidirectional GRU networks trained on word-level features, with Latent Topic Clustering modules, is the most accurate model scoring 0.805 F1.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 30 Aug 2018.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 7; 2022: 1; 2023: 1.

9 papers.