Regression adjustments for estimating the global treatment effect in experiments with interference
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Standard estimators of the global average treatment effect can be biased in the presence of interference. This paper proposes regression adjustment estimators for removing bias due to interference in Bernoulli randomized experiments. We use a fitted model to predict the counterfactual outcomes of global control and global treatment. Our work differs from standard regression adjustments in that the adjustment variables are constructed from functions of the treatment assignment vector, and that we allow the researcher to use a collection of any functions correlated with the response, turning the problem of detecting interference into a feature engineering problem. We characterize the distribution of the proposed estimator in a linear model setting and connect the results to the standard theory of regression adjustments under SUTVA. We then propose an estimator that allows for flexible machine learning estimators to be used for fitting a nonlinear interference functional form. We propose conducting statistical inference via bootstrap and resampling methods, which allow us to sidestep the complicated dependences implied by interference and instead rely on empirical covariance structures. Such variance estimation relies on an exogeneity assumption akin to the standard unconfoundedness assumption invoked in observational studies. In simulation experiments, our methods are better at debiasing estimates than existing inverse propensity weighted estimators based on neighborhood exposure modeling. We use our method to reanalyze an experiment concerning weather insurance adoption conducted on a collection of villages in rural China.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 27 Aug 2018.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 3; 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
10 papers.
- 2024Doubly Robust Causal Effect Estimation under Networked Interference via Targeted Learningcited by 19
- 2023Causal Message Passing for Experiments with Unknown and General Network Interferencecited by 7
- 2023A Two-Part Machine Learning Approach to Characterizing Network Interference in A/B Testingcited by 3
- 2023Clustered Switchback Designs for Experimentation Under Spatio-temporal Interferencecited by 3
- 2022Network Synthetic Interventions: A Causal Framework for Panel Data Under Network Interferencecited by 2
- 2022Treatment Effect Estimation with Observational Network Data using Machine Learningcited by 1
- 2025Causal Effect Estimation under Networked Interference without Networked Unconfoundedness Assumptioncited by 1
- 2025Local Interference: Removing Interference Bias in Semi-Parametric Causal Modelscited by 1
- 2024A/B testing under Interference with Partial Network Informationcited by 0
- 2026Conformal Individual Treatment Effect Estimation under Networked Interferencecited by 0
- 2026Conformal Individual Treatment Effect Estimation under Networked Interference14 Sep 2026
- 2025Local Interference: Removing Interference Bias in Semi-Parametric Causal Models24 Mar 2025
- 2025Causal Effect Estimation under Networked Interference without Networked Unconfoundedness Assumption27 Feb 2025
- 2024Doubly Robust Causal Effect Estimation under Networked Interference via Targeted Learning6 May 2024
- 2024A/B testing under Interference with Partial Network Information16 Apr 2024
- 2023Clustered Switchback Designs for Experimentation Under Spatio-temporal Interference25 Dec 2023
- 2023Causal Message Passing for Experiments with Unknown and General Network Interference14 Nov 2023
- 2023A Two-Part Machine Learning Approach to Characterizing Network Interference in A/B Testing18 Aug 2023
- 2022Network Synthetic Interventions: A Causal Framework for Panel Data Under Network Interference20 Oct 2022
- 2022Treatment Effect Estimation with Observational Network Data using Machine Learning29 Jun 2022