Controversy Rules - Discovering Regions Where Classifiers (Dis-)Agree Exceptionally
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Finding regions for which there is higher controversy among different classifiers is insightful with regards to the domain and our models. Such evaluation can falsify assumptions, assert some, or also, bring to the attention unknown phenomena. The present work describes an algorithm, which is based on the Exceptional Model Mining framework, and enables that kind of investigations. We explore several public datasets and show the usefulness of this approach in classification tasks. We show in this paper a few interesting observations about those well explored datasets, some of which are general knowledge, and other that as far as we know, were not reported before.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 22 Aug 2018.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1.
1 paper.