Gaussian Word Embedding with a Wasserstein Distance Loss
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Compared with word embedding based on point representation, distribution-based word embedding shows more flexibility in expressing uncertainty and therefore embeds richer semantic information when representing words. The Wasserstein distance provides a natural notion of dissimilarity with probability measures and has a closed-form solution when measuring the distance between two Gaussian distributions. Therefore, with the aim of representing words in a highly efficient way, we propose to operate a Gaussian word embedding model with a loss function based on the Wasserstein distance. Also, external information from ConceptNet will be used to semi-supervise the results of the Gaussian word embedding. Thirteen datasets from the word similarity task, together with one from the word entailment task, and six datasets from the downstream document classification task will be evaluated in this paper to test our hypothesis.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 21 Aug 2018.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 1; 2023: 1.
4 papers.
- 2022Sequential Recommendation via Stochastic Self-Attentioncited by 37
- 2021Re-evaluating Word Mover's Distancecited by 10
- 2023Mutual Wasserstein Discrepancy Minimization for Sequential Recommendationcited by 3
- 2021Robust Embeddings Via Distributionscited by 1
- 2023Mutual Wasserstein Discrepancy Minimization for Sequential Recommendation28 Jan 2023
- 2022Sequential Recommendation via Stochastic Self-Attention16 Jan 2022
- 2021Re-evaluating Word Mover's Distance30 May 2021
- 2021Robust Embeddings Via Distributions17 Apr 2021