mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Importance mixing: Improving sample reuse in evolutionary policy search methods

arXiv 1808.05832 ↗First posted 17 Aug 2018cs.LG stat.MLcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep neuroevolution, that is evolutionary policy search methods based on deep neural networks, have recently emerged as a competitor to deep reinforcement learning algorithms due to their better parallelization capabilities. However, these methods still suffer from a far worse sample efficiency. In this paper we investigate whether a mechanism known as "importance mixing" can significantly improve their sample efficiency. We provide a didactic presentation of importance mixing and we explain how it can be extended to reuse more samples. Then, from an empirical comparison based on a simple benchmark, we show that, though it actually provides better sample efficiency, it is still far from the sample efficiency of deep reinforcement learning, though it is more stable.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 17 Aug 2018.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 1; 2023: 1.

4 papers.