Importance mixing: Improving sample reuse in evolutionary policy search methods
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Deep neuroevolution, that is evolutionary policy search methods based on deep neural networks, have recently emerged as a competitor to deep reinforcement learning algorithms due to their better parallelization capabilities. However, these methods still suffer from a far worse sample efficiency. In this paper we investigate whether a mechanism known as "importance mixing" can significantly improve their sample efficiency. We provide a didactic presentation of importance mixing and we explain how it can be extended to reuse more samples. Then, from an empirical comparison based on a simple benchmark, we show that, though it actually provides better sample efficiency, it is still far from the sample efficiency of deep reinforcement learning, though it is more stable.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 17 Aug 2018.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 1; 2023: 1.
4 papers.
- 2021Deep Reinforcement Learning Versus Evolution Strategies: A Comparative Surveycited by 28
- 2021Derivative-Free Reinforcement Learning: A Reviewcited by 15
- 2023Evolving Multi-Objective Neural Network Controllers for Robot Swarmscited by 1
- 2022A Scalable Finite Difference Method for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 0
- 2023Evolving Multi-Objective Neural Network Controllers for Robot Swarms26 Jul 2023
- 2022A Scalable Finite Difference Method for Deep Reinforcement Learning14 Oct 2022
- 2021Deep Reinforcement Learning Versus Evolution Strategies: A Comparative Survey28 Sep 2021
- 2021Derivative-Free Reinforcement Learning: A Review10 Feb 2021