Two Local Models for Neural Constituent Parsing
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Non-local features have been exploited by syntactic parsers for capturing dependencies between sub output structures. Such features have been a key to the success of state-of-the-art statistical parsers. With the rise of deep learning, however, it has been shown that local output decisions can give highly competitive accuracies, thanks to the power of dense neural input representations that embody global syntactic information. We investigate two conceptually simple local neural models for constituent parsing, which make local decisions to constituent spans and CFG rules, respectively. Consistent with previous findings along the line, our best model gives highly competitive results, achieving the labeled bracketing F1 scores of 92.4% on PTB and 87.3% on CTB 5.1.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 14 Aug 2018.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 4; 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.
6 papers.
- 2021Bottom-Up Constituency Parsing and Nested Named Entity Recognition with Pointer Networkscited by 21
- 2021Investigating Non-local Features for Neural Constituency Parsingcited by 4
- 2021Discontinuous Grammar as a Foreign Languagecited by 4
- 2021In-Order Chart-Based Constituent Parsingcited by 1
- 2022Order-sensitive Neural Constituency Parsingcited by 0
- 2025Contrastive Learning on LLM Back Generation Treebank for Cross-domain Constituency Parsingcited by 0
- 2025Contrastive Learning on LLM Back Generation Treebank for Cross-domain Constituency Parsing27 May 2025
- 2022Order-sensitive Neural Constituency Parsing1 Nov 2022
- 2021Discontinuous Grammar as a Foreign Language20 Oct 2021
- 2021Bottom-Up Constituency Parsing and Nested Named Entity Recognition with Pointer Networks11 Oct 2021
- 2021Investigating Non-local Features for Neural Constituency Parsing27 Sep 2021
- 2021In-Order Chart-Based Constituent Parsing8 Feb 2021