mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

A simple counterexample to the Monge ansatz in multi-marginal optimal transport, convex geometry of the set of Kantorovich plans, and the Frenkel-Kontorova model

arXiv 1808.04318 ↗First posted 13 Aug 2018math.AP math-ph math.MPcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

It is known from clever mathematical examples citeCa10 that the Monge ansatz may fail in continuous two-marginal optimal transport (alias optimal coupling alias optimal assignment) problems. Here we show that this effect already occurs for finite assignment problems with N=3 marginals, ℓ=3 'sites', and symmetric pairwise costs, with the values for N and ℓ both being optimal. Our counterexample is a transparent consequence of the convex geometry of the set of symmetric Kantorovich plans for N=ℓ=3, which -- as we show -- possess 22 extreme points, only 7 of which are Monge. These extreme points have a simple physical meaning as irreducible molecular packings, and the example corresponds to finding the minimum energy packing for Frenkel-Kontorova interactions. Our finite example naturally gives rise, by superposition, to a continuous one, where failure of the Monge ansatz manifests itself as nonattainment and formation of 'microstructure'.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 13 Aug 2018.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1.

2 papers.