A simple counterexample to the Monge ansatz in multi-marginal optimal transport, convex geometry of the set of Kantorovich plans, and the Frenkel-Kontorova model
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
It is known from clever mathematical examples citeCa10 that the Monge ansatz may fail in continuous two-marginal optimal transport (alias optimal coupling alias optimal assignment) problems. Here we show that this effect already occurs for finite assignment problems with N=3 marginals, ℓ=3 'sites', and symmetric pairwise costs, with the values for N and ℓ both being optimal. Our counterexample is a transparent consequence of the convex geometry of the set of symmetric Kantorovich plans for N=ℓ=3, which -- as we show -- possess 22 extreme points, only 7 of which are Monge. These extreme points have a simple physical meaning as irreducible molecular packings, and the example corresponds to finding the minimum energy packing for Frenkel-Kontorova interactions. Our finite example naturally gives rise, by superposition, to a continuous one, where failure of the Monge ansatz manifests itself as nonattainment and formation of 'microstructure'.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 13 Aug 2018.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1.
2 papers.