Hoeffding Trees with nmin adaptation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Machine learning software accounts for a significant amount of energy consumed in data centers. These algorithms are usually optimized towards predictive performance, i.e. accuracy, and scalability. This is the case of data stream mining algorithms. Although these algorithms are adaptive to the incoming data, they have fixed parameters from the beginning of the execution. We have observed that having fixed parameters lead to unnecessary computations, thus making the algorithm energy inefficient. In this paper we present the nmin adaptation method for Hoeffding trees. This method adapts the value of the nmin parameter, which significantly affects the energy consumption of the algorithm. The method reduces unnecessary computations and memory accesses, thus reducing the energy, while the accuracy is only marginally affected. We experimentally compared VFDT (Very Fast Decision Tree, the first Hoeffding tree algorithm) and CVFDT (Concept-adapting VFDT) with the VFDT-nmin (VFDT with nmin adaptation). The results show that VFDT-nmin consumes up to 27% less energy than the standard VFDT, and up to 92% less energy than CVFDT, trading off a few percent of accuracy in a few datasets.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 3 Aug 2018.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 2.
3 papers.
- 2025DFDT: Dynamic Fast Decision Tree for IoT Data Stream Mining on Edge Devicescited by 9
- 2025On-device edge learning for IoT data streams: a surveycited by 8
- 2022Green Accelerated Hoeffding Treecited by 3
- 2025On-device edge learning for IoT data streams: a survey25 Feb 2025
- 2025DFDT: Dynamic Fast Decision Tree for IoT Data Stream Mining on Edge Devices19 Feb 2025
- 2022Green Accelerated Hoeffding Tree6 May 2022