Encoding Visual Sensitivity by MaxPol Convolution Filters for Image Sharpness Assessment
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In this paper, we propose a novel design of Human Visual System (HVS) response in a convolution filter form to decompose meaningful features that are closely tied with image sharpness level. No-reference (NR) Image sharpness assessment (ISA) techniques have emerged as the standard of image quality assessment in diverse imaging applications. Despite their high correlation with subjective scoring, they are challenging for practical considerations due to high computational cost and lack of scalability across different image blurs. We bridge this gap by synthesizing the HVS response as a linear combination of Finite Impulse Response (FIR) derivative filters to boost the falloff of high band frequency magnitudes in natural imaging paradigm. The numerical implementation of the HVS filter is carried out with MaxPol filter library that can be arbitrarily set for any differential orders and cutoff frequencies to balance out the estimation of informative features and noise sensitivities. We then design an innovative NR-ISA metric called `HVS-MaxPol' that (a) requires minimal computational cost, (b) produce high correlation accuracy with image blurriness, and (c) scales to assess synthetic and natural image blur. Specifically, the synthetic blur images are constructed by blurring the raw images using Gaussian filter, while natural blur is observed from real-life application such as motion, out-of-focus, etc. Furthermore, we create a natural benchmark database in digital pathology for validation of image focus quality in whole slide imaging systems called `FocusPath' consisting of 864 blurred images. Thorough experiments are designed to test and validate the efficiency of HVS-MaxPol across different blur databases and state-of-the-art NR-ISA metrics. The experiment result indicates that our metric has the best overall performance with respect to speed, accuracy and scalability.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 2 Aug 2018.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
7 papers.
- 2022Quality Assessment of Image Super-Resolution: Balancing Deterministic and Statistical Fidelitycited by 24
- 2021Image Super-Resolution Quality Assessment: Structural Fidelity Versus Statistical Naturalnesscited by 15
- 2023Unimodal Distributions for Ordinal Regressioncited by 9
- 2025PathOrchestra: A Comprehensive Foundation Model for Computational Pathology with Over 100 Diverse Clinical-Grade Taskscited by 8
- 2024Evaluation Metric for Quality Control and Generative Models in Histopathology Imagescited by 0
- 2025Automated Quality Evaluation of Cervical Cytopathology Whole Slide Images Based on Content Analysiscited by 0
- 2026FluoCLIP: Stain-Aware Focus Quality Assessment in Fluorescence Microscopycited by 0
- 2026FluoCLIP: Stain-Aware Focus Quality Assessment in Fluorescence Microscopy27 Feb 2026
- 2025Automated Quality Evaluation of Cervical Cytopathology Whole Slide Images Based on Content Analysis20 May 2025
- 2025PathOrchestra: A Comprehensive Foundation Model for Computational Pathology with Over 100 Diverse Clinical-Grade Tasks31 Mar 2025
- 2024Evaluation Metric for Quality Control and Generative Models in Histopathology Images1 Nov 2024
- 2023Unimodal Distributions for Ordinal Regression8 Mar 2023
- 2022Quality Assessment of Image Super-Resolution: Balancing Deterministic and Statistical Fidelity15 Jul 2022
- 2021Image Super-Resolution Quality Assessment: Structural Fidelity Versus Statistical Naturalness15 May 2021