Improving IR-Based Bug Localization with Context-Aware Query Reformulation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recent findings suggest that Information Retrieval (IR)-based bug localization techniques do not perform well if the bug report lacks rich structured information (eg relevant program entity names). Conversely, excessive structured information (eg stack traces) in the bug report might not always help the automated localization either. In this paper, we propose a novel technique--BLIZZARD-- that automatically localizes buggy entities from project source using appropriate query reformulation and effective information retrieval. In particular, our technique determines whether there are excessive program entities or not in a bug report (query), and then applies appropriate reformulations to the query for bug localization. Experiments using 5,139 bug reports show that our technique can localize the buggy source documents with 7%--56% higher Hit@10, 6%--62% higher MAP@10 and 6%--62% higher MRR@10 than the baseline technique. Comparison with the state-of-the-art techniques and their variants report that our technique can improve 19% in MAP@10 and 20% in MRR@10 over the state-of-the-art, and can improve 59% of the noisy queries and 39% of the poor queries.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 1 Aug 2018.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 0; 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 4.
11 papers.
- 2023RLocator: Reinforcement Learning for Bug Localizationcited by 7
- 2026SkillLens: Adaptive Multi-Granularity Skill Reuse for Cost-Efficient LLM Agentscited by 6
- 2021The Forgotten Role of Search Queries in IR-based Bug Localization: An Empirical Studycited by 5
- 2025Improved IR-based Bug Localization with Intelligent Relevance Feedbackcited by 5
- 2021A Systematic Review of Automated Query Reformulations in Source Code Searchcited by 2
- 2023Exploring Large Language Models in Resolving Environment-Related Crash Bugs: Localizing and Repairingcited by 1
- 2024SimClone: Detecting Tabular Data Clones using Value Similaritycited by 0
- 2025Reformulate, Retrieve, Localize: Agents for Repository-Level Bug Localizationcited by 0
- 2026Improved Bug Localization with AI Agents Leveraging Hypothesis and Dynamic Cognitioncited by 0
- 2026Ekka: Automated Diagnosis of Silent Errors in LLM Inferencecited by 0
- 2026HyperFL: Query-Adaptive Representation Learning for Software Fault Localizationcited by 0
- 2026HyperFL: Query-Adaptive Representation Learning for Software Fault Localization4 Aug 2026
- 2026Ekka: Automated Diagnosis of Silent Errors in LLM Inference3 Jun 2026
- 2026SkillLens: Adaptive Multi-Granularity Skill Reuse for Cost-Efficient LLM Agents8 May 2026
- 2026Improved Bug Localization with AI Agents Leveraging Hypothesis and Dynamic Cognition18 Jan 2026
- 2025Reformulate, Retrieve, Localize: Agents for Repository-Level Bug Localization7 Dec 2025
- 2025Improved IR-based Bug Localization with Intelligent Relevance Feedback17 Jan 2025
- 2024SimClone: Detecting Tabular Data Clones using Value Similarity24 Jun 2024
- 2023Exploring Large Language Models in Resolving Environment-Related Crash Bugs: Localizing and Repairing16 Dec 2023
- 2023RLocator: Reinforcement Learning for Bug Localization9 May 2023
- 2021A Systematic Review of Automated Query Reformulations in Source Code Search22 Aug 2021
- 2021The Forgotten Role of Search Queries in IR-based Bug Localization: An Empirical Study11 Aug 2021