Energy-based Tuning of Convolutional Neural Networks on Multi-GPUs
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Deep Learning (DL) applications are gaining momentum in the realm of Artificial Intelligence, particularly after GPUs have demonstrated remarkable skills for accelerating their challenging computational requirements. Within this context, Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) models constitute a representative example of success on a wide set of complex applications, particularly on datasets where the target can be represented through a hierarchy of local features of increasing semantic complexity. In most of the real scenarios, the roadmap to improve results relies on CNN settings involving brute force computation, and researchers have lately proven Nvidia GPUs to be one of the best hardware counterparts for acceleration. Our work complements those findings with an energy study on critical parameters for the deployment of CNNs on flagship image and video applications: object recognition and people identification by gait, respectively. We evaluate energy consumption on four different networks based on the two most popular ones (ResNet/AlexNet): ResNet (167 layers), a 2D CNN (15 layers), a CaffeNet (25 layers) and a ResNetIm (94 layers) using batch sizes of 64, 128 and 256, and then correlate those with speed-up and accuracy to determine optimal settings. Experimental results on a multi-GPU server endowed with twin Maxwell and twin Pascal Titan X GPUs demonstrate that energy correlates with performance and that Pascal may have up to 40% gains versus Maxwell. Larger batch sizes extend performance gains and energy savings, but we have to keep an eye on accuracy, which sometimes shows a preference for small batches. We expect this work to provide a preliminary guidance for a wide set of CNN and DL applications in modern HPC times, where the GFLOPS/w ratio constitutes the primary goal.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 1 Aug 2018.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
7 papers.
- 2023A Systematic Review of Green AIcited by 77
- 2023Accuracy is not the only Metric that matters: Estimating the Energy Consumption of Deep Learning Modelscited by 9
- 2023DOCTOR: A Multi-Disease Detection Continual Learning Framework Based on Wearable Medical Sensorscited by 7
- 2024How green is continual learning, really? Analyzing the energy consumption in continual training of vision foundation modelscited by 5
- 2024COMFORT: A Continual Fine-Tuning Framework for Foundation Models Targeted at Consumer Healthcarecited by 0
- 2025Phoeni6: a Systematic Approach for Evaluating the Energy Consumption of Neural Networkscited by 0
- 2026CARB: A Characterization-Guided Framework for CNN Inference Cost Prediction and Deployment Screeningcited by 0
- 2026CARB: A Characterization-Guided Framework for CNN Inference Cost Prediction and Deployment Screening11 Aug 2026
- 2025Phoeni6: a Systematic Approach for Evaluating the Energy Consumption of Neural Networks25 Feb 2025
- 2024How green is continual learning, really? Analyzing the energy consumption in continual training of vision foundation models27 Sep 2024
- 2024COMFORT: A Continual Fine-Tuning Framework for Foundation Models Targeted at Consumer Healthcare14 Sep 2024
- 2023DOCTOR: A Multi-Disease Detection Continual Learning Framework Based on Wearable Medical Sensors9 May 2023
- 2023Accuracy is not the only Metric that matters: Estimating the Energy Consumption of Deep Learning Models3 Apr 2023
- 2023A Systematic Review of Green AI26 Jan 2023