"Bilingual Expert" Can Find Translation Errors
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recent advances in statistical machine translation via the adoption of neural sequence-to-sequence models empower the end-to-end system to achieve state-of-the-art in many WMT benchmarks. The performance of such machine translation (MT) system is usually evaluated by automatic metric BLEU when the golden references are provided for validation. However, for model inference or production deployment, the golden references are prohibitively available or require expensive human annotation with bilingual expertise. In order to address the issue of quality evaluation (QE) without reference, we propose a general framework for automatic evaluation of translation output for most WMT quality evaluation tasks. We first build a conditional target language model with a novel bidirectional transformer, named neural bilingual expert model, which is pre-trained on large parallel corpora for feature extraction. For QE inference, the bilingual expert model can simultaneously produce the joint latent representation between the source and the translation, and real-valued measurements of possible erroneous tokens based on the prior knowledge learned from parallel data. Subsequently, the features will further be fed into a simple Bi-LSTM predictive model for quality evaluation. The experimental results show that our approach achieves the state-of-the-art performance in the quality estimation track of WMT 2017/2018.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 25 Jul 2018.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 6; 2022: 2; 2023: 1; 2024: 1.
10 papers.
- 2023AfriMTE and AfriCOMET: Enhancing COMET to Embrace Under-resourced African Languagescited by 24
- 2024From Handcrafted Features to LLMs: A Brief Survey for Machine Translation Quality Estimationcited by 10
- 2021DirectQE: Direct Pretraining for Machine Translation Quality Estimationcited by 7
- 2021Beyond Glass-Box Features: Uncertainty Quantification Enhanced Quality Estimation for Neural Machine Translationcited by 5
- 2021QEMind: Alibaba's Submission to the WMT21 Quality Estimation Shared Taskcited by 4
- 2022Rethink about the Word-level Quality Estimation for Machine Translation from Human Judgementcited by 2
- 2022Competency-Aware Neural Machine Translation: Can Machine Translation Know its Own Translation Quality?cited by 2
- 2021Verdi: Quality Estimation and Error Detection for Bilingual Corporacited by 1
- 2021Ensemble-based Transfer Learning for Low-resource Machine Translation Quality Estimationcited by 0
- 2021MDQE: A More Accurate Direct Pretraining for Machine Translation Quality Estimationcited by 0
- 2024From Handcrafted Features to LLMs: A Brief Survey for Machine Translation Quality Estimation21 Mar 2024
- 2023AfriMTE and AfriCOMET: Enhancing COMET to Embrace Under-resourced African Languages16 Nov 2023
- 2022Competency-Aware Neural Machine Translation: Can Machine Translation Know its Own Translation Quality?25 Nov 2022
- 2022Rethink about the Word-level Quality Estimation for Machine Translation from Human Judgement13 Sep 2022
- 2021QEMind: Alibaba's Submission to the WMT21 Quality Estimation Shared Task30 Dec 2021
- 2021Beyond Glass-Box Features: Uncertainty Quantification Enhanced Quality Estimation for Neural Machine Translation15 Sep 2021
- 2021MDQE: A More Accurate Direct Pretraining for Machine Translation Quality Estimation24 Jul 2021
- 2021Verdi: Quality Estimation and Error Detection for Bilingual Corpora31 May 2021
- 2021Ensemble-based Transfer Learning for Low-resource Machine Translation Quality Estimation17 May 2021
- 2021DirectQE: Direct Pretraining for Machine Translation Quality Estimation15 May 2021