mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

SETH Says: Weak Fr'echet Distance is Faster, but only if it is Continuous and in One Dimension

arXiv 1807.08699 ↗First posted 23 Jul 2018cs.CGcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We show by reduction from the Orthogonal Vectors problem that algorithms with strongly subquadratic running time cannot approximate the Fr'echet distance between curves better than a factor 3 unless SETH fails. We show that similar reductions cannot achieve a lower bound with a factor better than 3. Our lower bound holds for the continuous, the discrete, and the weak discrete Fr'echet distance even for curves in one dimension. Interestingly, the continuous weak Fr'echet distance behaves differently. Our lower bound still holds for curves in two dimensions and higher. However, for curves in one dimension, we provide an exact algorithm to compute the weak Fr'echet distance in linear time.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 23 Jul 2018.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2.

2 papers.