Planning and Synthesis Under Assumptions
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In Reasoning about Action and Planning, one synthesizes the agent plan by taking advantage of the assumption on how the environment works (that is, one exploits the environment's effects, its fairness, its trajectory constraints). In this paper we study this form of synthesis in detail. We consider assumptions as constraints on the possible strategies that the environment can have in order to respond to the agent's actions. Such constraints may be given in the form of a planning domain (or action theory), as linear-time formulas over infinite or finite runs, or as a combination of the two. We argue though that not all assumption specifications are meaningful: they need to be consistent, which means that there must exist an environment strategy fulfilling the assumption in spite of the agent actions. For such assumptions, we study how to do synthesis/planning for agent goals, ranging from a classical reachability to goal on traces specified in LTL and LTLf/LDLf, characterizing the problem both mathematically and algorithmically.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 18 Jul 2018.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 4.
4 papers.
- 2023LTLf Best-Effort Synthesis in Nondeterministic Planning Domains29 Aug 2023
- 2023LTLf Synthesis Under Environment Specifications for Reachability and Safety Properties29 Aug 2023
- 2023Symbolic LTLf Best-Effort Synthesis29 Aug 2023
- 2023Act for Your Duties but Maintain Your Rights7 Feb 2023