On the Ergodic Control of Ensembles
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Across smart-grid and smart-city application domains, there are many problems where an ensemble of agents is to be controlled such that both the aggregate behaviour and individual-level perception of the system's performance are acceptable. In many applications, traditional PI control is used to regulate aggregate ensemble performance. Our principal contribution in this note is to demonstrate that PI control may not be always suitable for this purpose, and in some situations may lead to a loss of ergodicity for closed-loop systems. Building on this observation, a theoretical framework is proposed to both analyse and design control systems for the regulation of large scale ensembles of agents with a probabilistic intent. Examples are given to illustrate our results.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 9 Jul 2018.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.
5 papers.
- 2021Predictability and Fairness in Load Aggregation and Operations of Virtual Power Plantscited by 4
- 2021Subgroup Fairness in Two-Sided Marketscited by 3
- 2022Closed-Loop View of the Regulation of AI: Equal Impact across Repeated Interactionscited by 3
- 2025humancompatible.interconnect: Testing Properties of Repeated Uses of Interconnections of AI Systemscited by 1
- 2023Predictability and Fairness in Load Aggregation with Deadbandcited by 0
- 2025humancompatible.interconnect: Testing Properties of Repeated Uses of Interconnections of AI Systems13 Jul 2025
- 2023Predictability and Fairness in Load Aggregation with Deadband28 May 2023
- 2022Closed-Loop View of the Regulation of AI: Equal Impact across Repeated Interactions3 Sep 2022
- 2021Predictability and Fairness in Load Aggregation and Operations of Virtual Power Plants6 Oct 2021
- 2021Subgroup Fairness in Two-Sided Markets4 Jun 2021