mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Minimizing Sensitivity to Model Misspecification

arXiv 1807.02161 ↗First posted 5 Jul 2018econ.EM stat.MEcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We propose a framework for estimation and inference when the model may be misspecified. We rely on a local asymptotic approach where the degree of misspecification is indexed by the sample size. We construct estimators whose mean squared error is minimax in a neighborhood of the reference model, based on one-step adjustments. In addition, we provide confidence intervals that contain the true parameter under local misspecification. As a tool to interpret the degree of misspecification, we map it to the local power of a specification test of the reference model. Our approach allows for systematic sensitivity analysis when the parameter of interest may be partially or irregularly identified. As illustrations, we study three applications: an empirical analysis of the impact of conditional cash transfers in Mexico where misspecification stems from the presence of stigma effects of the program, a cross-sectional binary choice model where the error distribution is misspecified, and a dynamic panel data binary choice model where the number of time periods is small and the distribution of individual effects is misspecified.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 5 Jul 2018.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 2.

3 papers.