mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

Logistic Regression, Neural Networks and Dempster-Shafer Theory: a New Perspective

arXiv 1807.01846 ↗First posted 5 Jul 2018cs.LG stat.MLcited by 11

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We revisit logistic regression and its nonlinear extensions, including multilayer feedforward neural networks, by showing that these classifiers can be viewed as converting input or higher-level features into Dempster-Shafer mass functions and aggregating them by Dempster's rule of combination. The probabilistic outputs of these classifiers are the normalized plausibilities corresponding to the underlying combined mass function. This mass function is more informative than the output probability distribution. In particular, it makes it possible to distinguish between lack of evidence (when none of the features provides discriminant information) from conflicting evidence (when different features support different classes). This expressivity of mass functions allows us to gain insight into the role played by each input feature in logistic regression, and to interpret hidden unit outputs in multilayer neural networks. It also makes it possible to use alternative decision rules, such as interval dominance, which select a set of classes when the available evidence does not unambiguously point to a single class, thus trading reduced error rate for higher imprecision.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 5 Jul 2018.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 13 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 5; 2022: 2; 2023: 0; 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 3.

11 papers.