Tight bounds for popping algorithms
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We sharpen run-time analysis for algorithms under the partial rejection sampling framework. Our method yields improved bounds for: the cluster-popping algorithm for approximating all-terminal network reliability; the cycle-popping algorithm for sampling rooted spanning trees; the sink-popping algorithm for sampling sink-free orientations. In all three applications, our bounds are not only tight in order, but also optimal in constants.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 4 Jul 2018.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1.
1 paper.