Contrastive Hebbian Learning with Random Feedback Weights
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Neural networks are commonly trained to make predictions through learning algorithms. Contrastive Hebbian learning, which is a powerful rule inspired by gradient backpropagation, is based on Hebb's rule and the contrastive divergence algorithm. It operates in two phases, the forward (or free) phase, where the data are fed to the network, and a backward (or clamped) phase, where the target signals are clamped to the output layer of the network and the feedback signals are transformed through the transpose synaptic weight matrices. This implies symmetries at the synaptic level, for which there is no evidence in the brain. In this work, we propose a new variant of the algorithm, called random contrastive Hebbian learning, which does not rely on any synaptic weights symmetries. Instead, it uses random matrices to transform the feedback signals during the clamped phase, and the neural dynamics are described by first order non-linear differential equations. The algorithm is experimentally verified by solving a Boolean logic task, classification tasks (handwritten digits and letters), and an autoencoding task. This article also shows how the parameters affect learning, especially the random matrices. We use the pseudospectra analysis to investigate further how random matrices impact the learning process. Finally, we discuss the biological plausibility of the proposed algorithm, and how it can give rise to better computational models for learning.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 19 Jun 2018.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 4; 2024: 0; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
8 papers.
- 2023Forward Learning with Top-Down Feedback: Empirical and Analytical Characterizationcited by 13
- 2023SPIDE: A Purely Spike-based Method for Training Feedback Spiking Neural Networkscited by 8
- 2023Spiking Neural Networks and Bio-Inspired Supervised Deep Learning: A Surveycited by 8
- 2023Efficient and Flexible Neural Network Training through Layer-wise Feedback Propagationcited by 2
- 2025Scaling Equilibrium Propagation to Deeper Neural Network Architecturescited by 1
- 2026Guiding Sparse Neural Networks with Neurobiological Principles to Elicit Biologically Plausible Representationscited by 1
- 2022aSTDP: A More Biologically Plausible Learningcited by 0
- 2026Minimizing the Effect of Sleep Deprivation in the Forward-Forward Algorithmcited by 0
- 2026Minimizing the Effect of Sleep Deprivation in the Forward-Forward Algorithm5 Sep 2026
- 2026Guiding Sparse Neural Networks with Neurobiological Principles to Elicit Biologically Plausible Representations3 Mar 2026
- 2025Scaling Equilibrium Propagation to Deeper Neural Network Architectures30 Sep 2025
- 2023Efficient and Flexible Neural Network Training through Layer-wise Feedback Propagation23 Aug 2023
- 2023Spiking Neural Networks and Bio-Inspired Supervised Deep Learning: A Survey30 Jul 2023
- 2023Forward Learning with Top-Down Feedback: Empirical and Analytical Characterization10 Feb 2023
- 2023SPIDE: A Purely Spike-based Method for Training Feedback Spiking Neural Networks1 Feb 2023
- 2022aSTDP: A More Biologically Plausible Learning22 May 2022