mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

On the Metric Distortion of Embedding Persistence Diagrams into separable Hilbert spaces

arXiv 1806.06924 ↗First posted 19 Jun 2018cs.LG cs.CG math.ATcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Persistence diagrams are important descriptors in Topological Data Analysis. Due to the nonlinearity of the space of persistence diagrams equipped with their em diagram distances, most of the recent attempts at using persistence diagrams in machine learning have been done through kernel methods, i.e., embeddings of persistence diagrams into Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Spaces, in which all computations can be performed easily. Since persistence diagrams enjoy theoretical stability guarantees for the diagram distances, the em metric properties of the feature map, i.e., the relationship between the Hilbert distance and the diagram distances, are of central interest for understanding if the persistence diagram guarantees carry over to the embedding. In this article, we study the possibility of embedding persistence diagrams into separable Hilbert spaces, with bi-Lipschitz maps. In particular, we show that for several stable embeddings into infinite-dimensional Hilbert spaces defined in the literature, any lower bound must depend on the cardinalities of the persistence diagrams, and that when the Hilbert space is finite dimensional, finding a bi-Lipschitz embedding is impossible, even when restricting the persistence diagrams to have bounded cardinalities.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 19 Jun 2018.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 2; 2023: 2; 2024: 0; 2025: 1; 2026: 3.

9 papers.