mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Source Printer Classification using Printer Specific Local Texture Descriptor

arXiv 1806.06650 ↗First posted 18 Jun 2018cs.MMcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The knowledge of source printer can help in printed text document authentication, copyright ownership, and provide important clues about the author of a fraudulent document along with his/her potential means and motives. Development of automated systems for classifying printed documents based on their source printer, using image processing techniques, is gaining a lot of attention in multimedia forensics. Currently, state-of-the-art systems require that the font of letters present in test documents of unknown origin must be available in those used for training the classifier. In this work, we attempt to take the first step towards overcoming this limitation. Specifically, we introduce a novel printer specific local texture descriptor. The highlight of our technique is the use of encoding and regrouping strategy based on small linear-shaped structures composed of pixels having similar intensity and gradient. The results of experiments performed on two separate datasets show that: 1) on a publicly available dataset, the proposed method outperforms state-of-the-art algorithms for characters printed in the same font, and 2) on another datasetfootnoteCode and dataset will be made publicly available with published version of this paper. having documents printed in four different fonts, the proposed method correctly classifies all test samples when sufficient training data is available in same font setup. In addition, it outperforms state-of-the-art methods for cross font experiments. Moreover, it reduces the confusion between the printers of same brand and model.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 18 Jun 2018.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 0; 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 2.

5 papers.