mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Sparse, Collaborative, or Nonnegative Representation: Which Helps Pattern Classification?

arXiv 1806.04329 ↗First posted 12 Jun 2018cs.CVcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The use of sparse representation (SR) and collaborative representation (CR) for pattern classification has been widely studied in tasks such as face recognition and object categorization. Despite the success of SR/CR based classifiers, it is still arguable whether it is the ℓ1-norm sparsity or the ℓ2-norm collaborative property that brings the success of SR/CR based classification. In this paper, we investigate the use of nonnegative representation (NR) for pattern classification, which is largely ignored by previous work. Our analyses reveal that NR can boost the representation power of homogeneous samples while limiting the representation power of heterogeneous samples, making the representation sparse and discriminative simultaneously and thus providing a more effective solution to representation based classification than SR/CR. Our experiments demonstrate that the proposed NR based classifier (NRC) outperforms previous representation based classifiers. With deep features as inputs, it also achieves state-of-the-art performance on various visual classification tasks.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 12 Jun 2018.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 0; 2023: 1; 2024: 1.

5 papers.