mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Autoencoders for music sound modeling: a comparison of linear, shallow, deep, recurrent and variational models

arXiv 1806.04096 ↗First posted 11 Jun 2018eess.AS cs.SDcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This study investigates the use of non-linear unsupervised dimensionality reduction techniques to compress a music dataset into a low-dimensional representation which can be used in turn for the synthesis of new sounds. We systematically compare (shallow) autoencoders (AEs), deep autoencoders (DAEs), recurrent autoencoders (with Long Short-Term Memory cells -- LSTM-AEs) and variational autoencoders (VAEs) with principal component analysis (PCA) for representing the high-resolution short-term magnitude spectrum of a large and dense dataset of music notes into a lower-dimensional vector (and then convert it back to a magnitude spectrum used for sound resynthesis). Our experiments were conducted on the publicly available multi-instrument and multi-pitch database NSynth. Interestingly and contrary to the recent literature on image processing, we can show that PCA systematically outperforms shallow AE. Only deep and recurrent architectures (DAEs and LSTM-AEs) lead to a lower reconstruction error. The optimization criterion in VAEs being the sum of the reconstruction error and a regularization term, it naturally leads to a lower reconstruction accuracy than DAEs but we show that VAEs are still able to outperform PCA while providing a low-dimensional latent space with nice "usability" properties. We also provide corresponding objective measures of perceptual audio quality (PEMO-Q scores), which generally correlate well with the reconstruction error.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 11 Jun 2018.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1.

1 paper.