TD or not TD: Analyzing the Role of Temporal Differencing in Deep Reinforcement Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Our understanding of reinforcement learning (RL) has been shaped by theoretical and empirical results that were obtained decades ago using tabular representations and linear function approximators. These results suggest that RL methods that use temporal differencing (TD) are superior to direct Monte Carlo estimation (MC). How do these results hold up in deep RL, which deals with perceptually complex environments and deep nonlinear models? In this paper, we re-examine the role of TD in modern deep RL, using specially designed environments that control for specific factors that affect performance, such as reward sparsity, reward delay, and the perceptual complexity of the task. When comparing TD with infinite-horizon MC, we are able to reproduce classic results in modern settings. Yet we also find that finite-horizon MC is not inferior to TD, even when rewards are sparse or delayed. This makes MC a viable alternative to TD in deep RL.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 4 Jun 2018.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 1.
4 papers.
- 2022Controlling Commercial Cooling Systems Using Reinforcement Learningcited by 25
- 2021Examining average and discounted reward optimality criteria in reinforcement learningcited by 6
- 2021Foresee then Evaluate: Decomposing Value Estimation with Latent Future Predictioncited by 3
- 2024To bootstrap or to rollout? An optimal and adaptive interpolationcited by 0
- 2024To bootstrap or to rollout? An optimal and adaptive interpolation14 Nov 2024
- 2022Controlling Commercial Cooling Systems Using Reinforcement Learning11 Nov 2022
- 2021Examining average and discounted reward optimality criteria in reinforcement learning3 Jul 2021
- 2021Foresee then Evaluate: Decomposing Value Estimation with Latent Future Prediction3 Mar 2021