mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

TD or not TD: Analyzing the Role of Temporal Differencing in Deep Reinforcement Learning

arXiv 1806.01175 ↗First posted 4 Jun 2018cs.LG cs.AI stat.MLcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Our understanding of reinforcement learning (RL) has been shaped by theoretical and empirical results that were obtained decades ago using tabular representations and linear function approximators. These results suggest that RL methods that use temporal differencing (TD) are superior to direct Monte Carlo estimation (MC). How do these results hold up in deep RL, which deals with perceptually complex environments and deep nonlinear models? In this paper, we re-examine the role of TD in modern deep RL, using specially designed environments that control for specific factors that affect performance, such as reward sparsity, reward delay, and the perceptual complexity of the task. When comparing TD with infinite-horizon MC, we are able to reproduce classic results in modern settings. Yet we also find that finite-horizon MC is not inferior to TD, even when rewards are sparse or delayed. This makes MC a viable alternative to TD in deep RL.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 4 Jun 2018.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 1.

4 papers.