Bayesian approach to model-based extrapolation of nuclear observables
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The mass, or binding energy, is the basis property of the atomic nucleus. It determines its stability, and reaction and decay rates. Quantifying the nuclear binding is important for understanding the origin of elements in the universe. The astrophysical processes responsible for the nucleosynthesis in stars often take place far from the valley of stability, where experimental masses are not known. In such cases, missing nuclear information must be provided by theoretical predictions using extreme extrapolations. Bayesian machine learning techniques can be applied to improve predictions by taking full advantage of the information contained in the deviations between experimental and calculated masses. We consider 10 global models based on nuclear Density Functional Theory as well as two more phenomenological mass models. The emulators of S2n residuals and credibility intervals defining theoretical error bars are constructed using Bayesian Gaussian processes and Bayesian neural networks. We consider a large training dataset pertaining to nuclei whose masses were measured before 2003. For the testing datasets, we considered those exotic nuclei whose masses have been determined after 2003. We then carried out extrapolations towards the 2n dripline. While both Gaussian processes and Bayesian neural networks reduce the rms deviation from experiment significantly, GP offers a better and much more stable performance. The increase in the predictive power is quite astonishing: the resulting rms deviations from experiment on the testing dataset are similar to those of more phenomenological models. The empirical coverage probability curves we obtain match very well the reference values which is highly desirable to ensure honesty of uncertainty quantification, and the estimated credibility intervals on predictions make it possible to evaluate predictive power of individual models.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 1 Jun 2018.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 2.
6 papers.
- 2021Machine Learning in Nuclear Physicscited by 4
- 2023Predicting nuclear masses with product-unit networkscited by 4
- 2023Local Bayesian Dirichlet mixing of imperfect modelscited by 2
- 2022Application of multilayer perceptron with data augmentation in nuclear physicscited by 1
- 2024Discovering Nuclear Models from Symbolic Machine Learningcited by 1
- 2024Model orthogonalization and Bayesian forecast mixing via Principal Component Analysiscited by 1
- 2024Model orthogonalization and Bayesian forecast mixing via Principal Component Analysis17 May 2024
- 2024Discovering Nuclear Models from Symbolic Machine Learning17 Apr 2024
- 2023Local Bayesian Dirichlet mixing of imperfect models2 Nov 2023
- 2023Predicting nuclear masses with product-unit networks8 May 2023
- 2022Application of multilayer perceptron with data augmentation in nuclear physics16 May 2022
- 2021Machine Learning in Nuclear Physics4 Dec 2021