Optimal Sample Size Planning for the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney-Test
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
There are many different proposed procedures for sample size planning for the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test at given type-I and type-II error rates α and β, respectively. Most methods assume very specific models or types of data in order to simplify calculations (for example, ordered categorical or metric data, location shift alternatives, etc.). We present a unified approach that covers metric data with and without ties, count data, ordered categorical data, and even dichotomous data. For that, we calculate the unknown theoretical quantities such as the variances under the null and relevant alternative hypothesis by considering the following `synthetic data' approach. We evaluate data whose empirical distribution functions match with the theoretical distribution functions involved in the computations of the unknown theoretical quantities. Then well-known relations for the ranks of the data are used for the calculations. In addition to computing the necessary sample size N for a fixed allocation proportion t = n1/N, where n1 is the sample size in the first group and N = n1 + n2 is the total sample size, we provide an interval for the optimal allocation rate t which minimizes the total sample size N. It turns out that for certain distributions, a balanced design is optimal. We give a characterization of these distributions. Furthermore we show that the optimal choice of t depends on the ratio of the two variances which determine the variance of the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney statistic under the alternative. This is different from an optimal sample size allocation in case of the normal distribution model.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 30 May 2018.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
3 papers.
- 2022SoK: The Impact of Unlabelled Data in Cyberthreat Detectioncited by 15
- 2023SoK: Pragmatic Assessment of Machine Learning for Network Intrusion Detectioncited by 13
- 2026How Much Human Label Variation Does Formal Semantic Structure Explain? Group-Level Effects and Item-Level Ceilings in NLIcited by 1
- 2026How Much Human Label Variation Does Formal Semantic Structure Explain? Group-Level Effects and Item-Level Ceilings in NLI17 Jul 2026
- 2023SoK: Pragmatic Assessment of Machine Learning for Network Intrusion Detection30 Apr 2023
- 2022SoK: The Impact of Unlabelled Data in Cyberthreat Detection18 May 2022