Towards Lipreading Sentences with Active Appearance Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Automatic lipreading has major potential impact for speech recognition, supplementing and complementing the acoustic modality. Most attempts at lipreading have been performed on small vocabulary tasks, due to a shortfall of appropriate audio-visual datasets. In this work we use the publicly available TCD-TIMIT database, designed for large vocabulary continuous audio-visual speech recognition. We compare the viseme recognition performance of the most widely used features for lipreading, Discrete Cosine Transform (DCT) and Active Appearance Models (AAM), in a traditional Hidden Markov Model (HMM) framework. We also exploit recent advances in AAM fitting. We found the DCT to outperform AAM by more than 6% for a viseme recognition task with 56 speakers. The overall accuracy of the DCT is quite low (32-34%). We conclude that a fundamental rethink of the modelling of visual features may be needed for this task.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 29 May 2018.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.
4 papers.
- 2021LipSound2: Self-Supervised Pre-Training for Lip-to-Speech Reconstruction and Lip Readingcited by 10
- 2021LRWR: Large-Scale Benchmark for Lip Reading in Russian languagecited by 5
- 2022Is Lip Region-of-Interest Sufficient for Lipreading?cited by 5
- 2025Target Speaker Lipreading by Audio-Visual Self-Distillation Pretraining and Speaker Adaptationcited by 2
- 2025Target Speaker Lipreading by Audio-Visual Self-Distillation Pretraining and Speaker Adaptation9 Feb 2025
- 2022Is Lip Region-of-Interest Sufficient for Lipreading?28 May 2022
- 2021LipSound2: Self-Supervised Pre-Training for Lip-to-Speech Reconstruction and Lip Reading9 Dec 2021
- 2021LRWR: Large-Scale Benchmark for Lip Reading in Russian language14 Sep 2021