LSTMs Exploit Linguistic Attributes of Data
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
While recurrent neural networks have found success in a variety of natural language processing applications, they are general models of sequential data. We investigate how the properties of natural language data affect an LSTM's ability to learn a nonlinguistic task: recalling elements from its input. We find that models trained on natural language data are able to recall tokens from much longer sequences than models trained on non-language sequential data. Furthermore, we show that the LSTM learns to solve the memorization task by explicitly using a subset of its neurons to count timesteps in the input. We hypothesize that the patterns and structure in natural language data enable LSTMs to learn by providing approximate ways of reducing loss, but understanding the effect of different training data on the learnability of LSTMs remains an open question.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 29 May 2018.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 1.
3 papers.
- 2022Pretraining with Artificial Language: Studying Transferable Knowledge in Language Modelscited by 28
- 2021What do End-to-End Speech Models Learn about Speaker, Language and Channel Information? A Layer-wise and Neuron-level Analysiscited by 9
- 2021Recoding latent sentence representations -- Dynamic gradient-based activation modification in RNNscited by 0
- 2022Pretraining with Artificial Language: Studying Transferable Knowledge in Language Models19 Mar 2022
- 2021What do End-to-End Speech Models Learn about Speaker, Language and Channel Information? A Layer-wise and Neuron-level Analysis1 Jul 2021
- 2021Recoding latent sentence representations -- Dynamic gradient-based activation modification in RNNs3 Jan 2021