Understanding Generalization and Optimization Performance of Deep CNNs
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This work aims to provide understandings on the remarkable success of deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) by theoretically analyzing their generalization performance and establishing optimization guarantees for gradient descent based training algorithms. Specifically, for a CNN model consisting of l convolutional layers and one fully connected layer, we prove that its generalization error is bounded by O(√dtwidetildevarrho/n) where θ denotes freedom degree of the network parameters and widetildevarrho=O(log(prodi=1lrwii (kii-sii+1)/p)+log(rf)) encapsulates architecture parameters including the kernel size kii, stride sii, pooling size p and parameter magnitude rwii. To our best knowledge, this is the first generalization bound that only depends on O(log(prodi=1l+1rwii)), tighter than existing ones that all involve an exponential term like O(prodi=1l+1rwii). Besides, we prove that for an arbitrary gradient descent algorithm, the computed approximate stationary point by minimizing empirical risk is also an approximate stationary point to the population risk. This well explains why gradient descent training algorithms usually perform sufficiently well in practice. Furthermore, we prove the one-to-one correspondence and convergence guarantees for the non-degenerate stationary points between the empirical and population risks. It implies that the computed local minimum for the empirical risk is also close to a local minimum for the population risk, thus ensuring the good generalization performance of CNNs.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 28 May 2018.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 4; 2022: 3; 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.
9 papers.
- 2021Analyzing Overfitting under Class Imbalance in Neural Networks for Image Segmentationcited by 34
- 2022Evaluating the Generalization Ability of Super-Resolution Networkscited by 18
- 2022Generalization Error Bounds for Deep Neural Networks Trained by SGDcited by 14
- 2021A Theory-Driven Self-Labeling Refinement Method for Contrastive Representation Learningcited by 7
- 2025Leaner Transformers: More Heads, Less Depthcited by 5
- 2021Non-asymptotic Excess Risk Bounds for Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 4
- 2022CNNs Avoid Curse of Dimensionality by Learning on Patchescited by 3
- 2021Slope and generalization properties of neural networkscited by 0
- 2023Multi-scale Fusion Fault Diagnosis Method Based on Two-Dimensionaliztion Sequence in Complex Scenarioscited by 0
- 2025Leaner Transformers: More Heads, Less Depth27 May 2025
- 2023Multi-scale Fusion Fault Diagnosis Method Based on Two-Dimensionaliztion Sequence in Complex Scenarios11 Apr 2023
- 2022Generalization Error Bounds for Deep Neural Networks Trained by SGD7 Jun 2022
- 2022CNNs Avoid Curse of Dimensionality by Learning on Patches22 May 2022
- 2022Evaluating the Generalization Ability of Super-Resolution Networks14 May 2022
- 2021Slope and generalization properties of neural networks3 Jul 2021
- 2021A Theory-Driven Self-Labeling Refinement Method for Contrastive Representation Learning28 Jun 2021
- 2021Non-asymptotic Excess Risk Bounds for Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks1 May 2021
- 2021Analyzing Overfitting under Class Imbalance in Neural Networks for Image Segmentation20 Feb 2021