mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

How Much Restricted Isometry is Needed In Nonconvex Matrix Recovery?

arXiv 1805.10251 ↗First posted 25 May 2018cs.LG math.OC stat.MLcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

When the linear measurements of an instance of low-rank matrix recovery satisfy a restricted isometry property (RIP)---i.e. they are approximately norm-preserving---the problem is known to contain no spurious local minima, so exact recovery is guaranteed. In this paper, we show that moderate RIP is not enough to eliminate spurious local minima, so existing results can only hold for near-perfect RIP. In fact, counterexamples are ubiquitous: we prove that every x is the spurious local minimum of a rank-1 instance of matrix recovery that satisfies RIP. One specific counterexample has RIP constant δ=1/2, but causes randomly initialized stochastic gradient descent (SGD) to fail 12% of the time. SGD is frequently able to avoid and escape spurious local minima, but this empirical result shows that it can occasionally be defeated by their existence. Hence, while exact recovery guarantees will likely require a proof of no spurious local minima, arguments based solely on norm preservation will only be applicable to a narrow set of nearly-isotropic instances.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 25 May 2018.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 2; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

8 papers.