Author Obfuscation Using Generalised Differential Privacy
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The problem of obfuscating the authorship of a text document has received little attention in the literature to date. Current approaches are ad-hoc and rely on assumptions about an adversary's auxiliary knowledge which makes it difficult to reason about the privacy properties of these methods. Differential privacy is a well-known and robust privacy approach, but its reliance on the notion of adjacency between datasets has prevented its application to text document privacy. However, generalised differential privacy permits the application of differential privacy to arbitrary datasets endowed with a metric and has been demonstrated on problems involving the release of individual data points. In this paper we show how to apply generalised differential privacy to author obfuscation by utilising existing tools and methods from the stylometry and natural language processing literature.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 22 May 2018.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 0; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
4 papers.
- 2023Guiding Text-to-Text Privatization by Syntaxcited by 14
- 2022Differential Privacy in Natural Language Processing: The Story So Farcited by 12
- 2023Defending Against Authorship Identification Attackscited by 1
- 2026Interpolation-Based Optimization for Enforcing lp-Norm Metric Differential Privacy in Continuous and Fine-Grained Domainscited by 0
- 2026Interpolation-Based Optimization for Enforcing lp-Norm Metric Differential Privacy in Continuous and Fine-Grained Domains15 Jan 2026
- 2023Defending Against Authorship Identification Attacks2 Oct 2023
- 2023Guiding Text-to-Text Privatization by Syntax2 Jun 2023
- 2022Differential Privacy in Natural Language Processing: The Story So Far17 Aug 2022