Linear-Time Constituency Parsing with RNNs and Dynamic Programming
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recently, span-based constituency parsing has achieved competitive accuracies with extremely simple models by using bidirectional RNNs to model "spans". However, the minimal span parser of Stern et al (2017a) which holds the current state of the art accuracy is a chart parser running in cubic time, O(n3), which is too slow for longer sentences and for applications beyond sentence boundaries such as end-to-end discourse parsing and joint sentence boundary detection and parsing. We propose a linear-time constituency parser with RNNs and dynamic programming using graph-structured stack and beam search, which runs in time O(n b2) where b is the beam size. We further speed this up to O(n blog b) by integrating cube pruning. Compared with chart parsing baselines, this linear-time parser is substantially faster for long sentences on the Penn Treebank and orders of magnitude faster for discourse parsing, and achieves the highest F1 accuracy on the Penn Treebank among single model end-to-end systems.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 17 May 2018.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2.
2 papers.
- 2021In-Order Chart-Based Constituent Parsingcited by 1
- 2021Searching for More Efficient Dynamic Programscited by 1
- 2021Searching for More Efficient Dynamic Programs14 Sep 2021
- 2021In-Order Chart-Based Constituent Parsing8 Feb 2021