Are BLEU and Meaning Representation in Opposition?
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
One of possible ways of obtaining continuous-space sentence representations is by training neural machine translation (NMT) systems. The recent attention mechanism however removes the single point in the neural network from which the source sentence representation can be extracted. We propose several variations of the attentive NMT architecture bringing this meeting point back. Empirical evaluation suggests that the better the translation quality, the worse the learned sentence representations serve in a wide range of classification and similarity tasks.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 16 May 2018.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 2; 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.
5 papers.
- 2021Do Multilingual Neural Machine Translation Models Contain Language Pair Specific Attention Heads?cited by 6
- 2022NMTScore: A Multilingual Analysis of Translation-based Text Similarity Measurescited by 6
- 2023Rationalizing Predictions by Adversarial Information Calibrationcited by 4
- 2022On the Role of Pre-trained Language Models in Word Ordering: A Case Study with BARTcited by 2
- 2025Intrinsic vs. Extrinsic Evaluation of Czech Sentence Embeddings: Semantic Relevance Doesn't Help with MT Evaluationcited by 0
- 2025Intrinsic vs. Extrinsic Evaluation of Czech Sentence Embeddings: Semantic Relevance Doesn't Help with MT Evaluation25 Jun 2025
- 2023Rationalizing Predictions by Adversarial Information Calibration15 Jan 2023
- 2022NMTScore: A Multilingual Analysis of Translation-based Text Similarity Measures28 Apr 2022
- 2022On the Role of Pre-trained Language Models in Word Ordering: A Case Study with BART15 Apr 2022
- 2021Do Multilingual Neural Machine Translation Models Contain Language Pair Specific Attention Heads?31 May 2021