mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Quantitative Projection Coverage for Testing ML-enabled Autonomous Systems

arXiv 1805.04333 ↗First posted 11 May 2018cs.SE cs.LGcited by 11

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Systematically testing models learned from neural networks remains a crucial unsolved barrier to successfully justify safety for autonomous vehicles engineered using data-driven approach. We propose quantitative k-projection coverage as a metric to mediate combinatorial explosion while guiding the data sampling process. By assuming that domain experts propose largely independent environment conditions and by associating elements in each condition with weights, the product of these conditions forms scenarios, and one may interpret weights associated with each equivalence class as relative importance. Achieving full k-projection coverage requires that the data set, when being projected to the hyperplane formed by arbitrarily selected k-conditions, covers each class with number of data points no less than the associated weight. For the general case where scenario composition is constrained by rules, precisely computing k-projection coverage remains in NP. In terms of finding minimum test cases to achieve full coverage, we present theoretical complexity for important sub-cases and an encoding to 0-1 integer programming. We have implemented a research prototype that generates test cases for a visual object defection unit in automated driving, demonstrating the technological feasibility of our proposed coverage criterion.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 11 May 2018.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 5; 2023: 2; 2024: 2; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

11 papers.