Quantitative Projection Coverage for Testing ML-enabled Autonomous Systems
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Systematically testing models learned from neural networks remains a crucial unsolved barrier to successfully justify safety for autonomous vehicles engineered using data-driven approach. We propose quantitative k-projection coverage as a metric to mediate combinatorial explosion while guiding the data sampling process. By assuming that domain experts propose largely independent environment conditions and by associating elements in each condition with weights, the product of these conditions forms scenarios, and one may interpret weights associated with each equivalence class as relative importance. Achieving full k-projection coverage requires that the data set, when being projected to the hyperplane formed by arbitrarily selected k-conditions, covers each class with number of data points no less than the associated weight. For the general case where scenario composition is constrained by rules, precisely computing k-projection coverage remains in NP. In terms of finding minimum test cases to achieve full coverage, we present theoretical complexity for important sub-cases and an encoding to 0-1 integer programming. We have implemented a research prototype that generates test cases for a visual object defection unit in automated driving, demonstrating the technological feasibility of our proposed coverage criterion.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 11 May 2018.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 5; 2023: 2; 2024: 2; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
11 papers.
- 2023Machine Learning with Requirements: a Manifestocited by 8
- 2022Toward Certification of Machine-Learning Systems for Low Criticality Airborne Applicationscited by 6
- 2022Unaligned but Safe -- Formally Compensating Performance Limitations for Imprecise 2D Object Detectioncited by 3
- 2022Prioritizing Corners in OoD Detectors via Symbolic String Manipulationcited by 3
- 2023Probabilistic Risk Assessment of an Obstacle Detection System for GoA 4 Freight Trainscited by 3
- 2024A Survey of Neural Network Robustness Assessment in Image Recognitioncited by 2
- 2022Backdoor Mitigation in Deep Neural Networks via Strategic Retrainingcited by 1
- 2026CLAP: Contrastive Latent-space Prompt Optimization for End-to-end Autonomous Drivingcited by 1
- 2021Testing Autonomous Systems with Believed Equivalence Refinementcited by 0
- 2022Safe AI -- How is this Possible?cited by 0
- 2024Effective Black Box Testing of Sentiment Analysis Classification Networkscited by 0
- 2026CLAP: Contrastive Latent-space Prompt Optimization for End-to-end Autonomous Driving17 May 2026
- 2024Effective Black Box Testing of Sentiment Analysis Classification Networks30 Jul 2024
- 2024A Survey of Neural Network Robustness Assessment in Image Recognition12 Apr 2024
- 2023Probabilistic Risk Assessment of an Obstacle Detection System for GoA 4 Freight Trains26 Jun 2023
- 2023Machine Learning with Requirements: a Manifesto7 Apr 2023
- 2022Backdoor Mitigation in Deep Neural Networks via Strategic Retraining14 Dec 2022
- 2022Toward Certification of Machine-Learning Systems for Low Criticality Airborne Applications28 Sep 2022
- 2022Prioritizing Corners in OoD Detectors via Symbolic String Manipulation16 May 2022
- 2022Unaligned but Safe -- Formally Compensating Performance Limitations for Imprecise 2D Object Detection10 Feb 2022
- 2022Safe AI -- How is this Possible?25 Jan 2022
- 2021Testing Autonomous Systems with Believed Equivalence Refinement8 Mar 2021