Sharp Analysis of a Simple Model for Random Forests
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Random forests have become an important tool for improving accuracy in regression and classification problems since their inception by Leo Breiman in 2001. In this paper, we revisit a historically important random forest model originally proposed by Breiman in 2004 and later studied by G'erard Biau in 2012, where a feature is selected at random and the splits occurs at the midpoint of the node along the chosen feature. If the regression function is Lipschitz and depends only on a small subset of S out of d features, we show that, given access to n observations and properly tuned split probabilities, the mean-squared prediction error is O((n(log n)(S-1)/2)^-frac1Slog2+1) . This positively answers an outstanding question of Biau about whether the rate of convergence for this random forest model could be improved. Furthermore, by a refined analysis of the approximation and estimation errors for linear models, we show that this rate cannot be improved in general. Finally, we generalize our analysis and improve extant prediction error bounds for another random forest model in which each tree is constructed from subsampled data and the splits are performed at the empirical median along a chosen feature.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 7 May 2018.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.
1 paper.
- 2024Exogenous Randomness Empowering Random Forestscited by 2
- 2024Exogenous Randomness Empowering Random Forests12 Nov 2024