Exploiting Answer Set Programming with External Sources for Meta-Interpretive Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Meta-Interpretive Learning (MIL) learns logic programs from examples by instantiating meta-rules, which is implemented by the Metagol system based on Prolog. Viewing MIL-problems as combinatorial search problems, they can alternatively be solved by employing Answer Set Programming (ASP), which may result in performance gains as a result of efficient conflict propagation. However, a straightforward ASP-encoding of MIL results in a huge search space due to a lack of procedural bias and the need for grounding. To address these challenging issues, we encode MIL in the HEX-formalism, which is an extension of ASP that allows us to outsource the background knowledge, and we restrict the search space to compensate for a procedural bias in ASP. This way, the import of constants from the background knowledge can for a given type of meta-rules be limited to relevant ones. Moreover, by abstracting from term manipulations in the encoding and by exploiting the HEX interface mechanism, the import of such constants can be entirely avoided in order to mitigate the grounding bottleneck. An experimental evaluation shows promising results.
Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 30 Apr 2018.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 7; 2022: 3; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
12 papers.
- 2021Inductive logic programming at 30cited by 46
- 2021Learning Higher-Order Programs without Meta-Interpretive Learningcited by 14
- 2021Top Program Construction and Reduction for polynomial time Meta-Interpretive Learningcited by 6
- 2021Learning Logic Programs From Noisy Failurescited by 5
- 2022Learning First-Order Rules with Differentiable Logic Program Semanticscited by 5
- 2021Meta-Interpretive Learning as Metarule Specialisationcited by 2
- 2022Learning programs with magic valuescited by 2
- 2022Relational program synthesis with numerical reasoningcited by 2
- 2021Learning logic programs through divide, constrain, and conquercited by 1
- 2021Parallel Constraint-Driven Inductive Logic Programmingcited by 0
- 2025Neuro-Symbolic Contrastive Learning for Cross-domain Inferencecited by 0
- 2026Visual Perceptual to Conceptual First-Order Rule Learning Networkscited by 0
- 2026Visual Perceptual to Conceptual First-Order Rule Learning Networks9 Apr 2026
- 2025Neuro-Symbolic Contrastive Learning for Cross-domain Inference13 Feb 2025
- 2022Relational program synthesis with numerical reasoning3 Oct 2022
- 2022Learning programs with magic values5 Aug 2022
- 2022Learning First-Order Rules with Differentiable Logic Program Semantics28 Apr 2022
- 2021Learning Higher-Order Programs without Meta-Interpretive Learning29 Dec 2021
- 2021Learning Logic Programs From Noisy Failures28 Dec 2021
- 2021Learning logic programs through divide, constrain, and conquer16 Sep 2021
- 2021Parallel Constraint-Driven Inductive Logic Programming15 Sep 2021
- 2021Meta-Interpretive Learning as Metarule Specialisation9 Jun 2021
- 2021Inductive logic programming at 3021 Feb 2021
- 2021Top Program Construction and Reduction for polynomial time Meta-Interpretive Learning13 Jan 2021