Model-Free Linear Quadratic Control via Reduction to Expert Prediction
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Model-free approaches for reinforcement learning (RL) and continuous control find policies based only on past states and rewards, without fitting a model of the system dynamics. They are appealing as they are general purpose and easy to implement; however, they also come with fewer theoretical guarantees than model-based RL. In this work, we present a new model-free algorithm for controlling linear quadratic (LQ) systems, and show that its regret scales as O(Txi+2/3) for any small xi>0 if time horizon satisfies T>C1/xi for a constant C. The algorithm is based on a reduction of control of Markov decision processes to an expert prediction problem. In practice, it corresponds to a variant of policy iteration with forced exploration, where the policy in each phase is greedy with respect to the average of all previous value functions. This is the first model-free algorithm for adaptive control of LQ systems that provably achieves sublinear regret and has a polynomial computation cost. Empirically, our algorithm dramatically outperforms standard policy iteration, but performs worse than a model-based approach.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 17 Apr 2018.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2020: 1; 2021: 2; 2022: 6; 2023: 1.
10 papers.
- 2020Average-reward model-free reinforcement learning: a systematic review and literature mappingcited by 19
- 2022Regret Lower Bounds for Learning Linear Quadratic Gaussian Systemscited by 11
- 2021Online Policy Gradient for Model Free Learning of Linear Quadratic Regulators with √T Regretcited by 10
- 2022Learning to Control Linear Systems can be Hardcited by 10
- 2022How are policy gradient methods affected by the limits of control?cited by 6
- 2021Regret Analysis of Learning-Based MPC with Partially-Unknown Cost Functioncited by 5
- 2022Augmented RBMLE-UCB Approach for Adaptive Control of Linear Quadratic Systemscited by 5
- 2022Rate-Optimal Online Convex Optimization in Adaptive Linear Controlcited by 5
- 2022Managing Temporal Resolution in Continuous Value Estimation: A Fundamental Trade-offcited by 1
- 2023Data-Driven H-infinity Control with a Real-Time and Efficient Reinforcement Learning Algorithm: An Application to Autonomous Mobility-on-Demand Systemscited by 0
- 2023Data-Driven H-infinity Control with a Real-Time and Efficient Reinforcement Learning Algorithm: An Application to Autonomous Mobility-on-Demand Systems16 Sep 2023
- 2022Managing Temporal Resolution in Continuous Value Estimation: A Fundamental Trade-off17 Dec 2022
- 2022How are policy gradient methods affected by the limits of control?14 Jun 2022
- 2022Rate-Optimal Online Convex Optimization in Adaptive Linear Control3 Jun 2022
- 2022Learning to Control Linear Systems can be Hard27 May 2022
- 2022Augmented RBMLE-UCB Approach for Adaptive Control of Linear Quadratic Systems25 Jan 2022
- 2022Regret Lower Bounds for Learning Linear Quadratic Gaussian Systems5 Jan 2022
- 2021Regret Analysis of Learning-Based MPC with Partially-Unknown Cost Function4 Aug 2021
- 2021Online Policy Gradient for Model Free Learning of Linear Quadratic Regulators with √T Regret25 Feb 2021
- 2020Average-reward model-free reinforcement learning: a systematic review and literature mapping18 Oct 2020