Near Human-Level Performance in Grammatical Error Correction with Hybrid Machine Translation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We combine two of the most popular approaches to automated Grammatical Error Correction (GEC): GEC based on Statistical Machine Translation (SMT) and GEC based on Neural Machine Translation (NMT). The hybrid system achieves new state-of-the-art results on the CoNLL-2014 and JFLEG benchmarks. This GEC system preserves the accuracy of SMT output and, at the same time, generates more fluent sentences as it typical for NMT. Our analysis shows that the created systems are closer to reaching human-level performance than any other GEC system reported so far.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 16 Apr 2018.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 3; 2023: 1.
6 papers.
- 2022Grammatical Error Correction: A Survey of the State of the Artcited by 43
- 2021Comparison of Grammatical Error Correction Using Back-Translation Modelscited by 9
- 2023Analyzing the Performance of GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 in Grammatical Error Correctioncited by 7
- 2021Do Grammatical Error Correction Models Realize Grammatical Generalization?cited by 6
- 2022Towards Lithuanian grammatical error correctioncited by 2
- 2022Proficiency Matters Quality Estimation in Grammatical Error Correctioncited by 0
- 2023Analyzing the Performance of GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 in Grammatical Error Correction25 Mar 2023
- 2022Grammatical Error Correction: A Survey of the State of the Art9 Nov 2022
- 2022Towards Lithuanian grammatical error correction18 Mar 2022
- 2022Proficiency Matters Quality Estimation in Grammatical Error Correction17 Jan 2022
- 2021Do Grammatical Error Correction Models Realize Grammatical Generalization?6 Jun 2021
- 2021Comparison of Grammatical Error Correction Using Back-Translation Models16 Apr 2021