mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Representing smooth functions as compositions of near-identity functions with implications for deep network optimization

arXiv 1804.05012 ↗First posted 13 Apr 2018cs.LG cs.AI cs.NEcited by 15

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We show that any smooth bi-Lipschitz h can be represented exactly as a composition hm circ ... circ h1 of functions h1,...,hm that are close to the identity in the sense that each left(hi-Idright) is Lipschitz, and the Lipschitz constant decreases inversely with the number m of functions composed. This implies that h can be represented to any accuracy by a deep residual network whose nonlinear layers compute functions with a small Lipschitz constant. Next, we consider nonlinear regression with a composition of near-identity nonlinear maps. We show that, regarding Fr'echet derivatives with respect to the h1,...,hm, any critical point of a quadratic criterion in this near-identity region must be a global minimizer. In contrast, if we consider derivatives with respect to parameters of a fixed-size residual network with sigmoid activation functions, we show that there are near-identity critical points that are suboptimal, even in the realizable case. Informally, this means that functional gradient methods for residual networks cannot get stuck at suboptimal critical points corresponding to near-identity layers, whereas parametric gradient methods for sigmoidal residual networks suffer from suboptimal critical points in the near-identity region.

Key facts. Cited by 15 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 13 Apr 2018.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 7; 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

15 papers.

Sort: