The Communication Complexity of Local Search
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We study the following communication variant of local search. There is some fixed, commonly known graph G. Alice holds fA and Bob holds fB, both are functions that specify a value for each vertex. The goal is to find a local maximum of fA+fB with respect to G, i.e., a vertex v for which (fA+fB)(v)≥ (fA+fB)(u) for every neighbor u of v. Our main result is that finding a local maximum requires polynomial (in the number of vertices) bits of communication. The result holds for the following families of graphs: three dimensional grids, hypercubes, odd graphs, and degree 4 graphs. Moreover, we provide an optimal communication bound of Omega(√N) for the hypercube, and for a constant dimensional greed, where N is the number of vertices in the graph. We provide applications of our main result in two domains, exact potential games and combinatorial auctions. First, we show that finding a pure Nash equilibrium in 2-player N-action exact potential games requires polynomial (in N) communication. We also show that finding a pure Nash equilibrium in n-player 2-action exact potential games requires exponential (in n) communication. The second domain that we consider is combinatorial auctions, in which we prove that finding a local maximum in combinatorial auctions requires exponential (in the number of items) communication even when the valuations are submodular. Each one of the results demonstrates an exponential separation between the non-deterministic communication complexity and the randomized communication complexity of a total search problem.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 8 Apr 2018.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1.
1 paper.