mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Performance Evaluation of 3D Correspondence Grouping Algorithms

arXiv 1804.02085 ↗First posted 6 Apr 2018cs.CV cs.ROcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This paper presents a thorough evaluation of several widely-used 3D correspondence grouping algorithms, motived by their significance in vision tasks relying on correct feature correspondences. A good correspondence grouping algorithm is desired to retrieve as many as inliers from initial feature matches, giving a rise in both precision and recall. Towards this rule, we deploy the experiments on three benchmarks respectively addressing shape retrieval, 3D object recognition and point cloud registration scenarios. The variety in application context brings a rich category of nuisances including noise, varying point densities, clutter, occlusion and partial overlaps. It also results to different ratios of inliers and correspondence distributions for comprehensive evaluation. Based on the quantitative outcomes, we give a summarization of the merits/demerits of the evaluated algorithms from both performance and efficiency perspectives.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 6 Apr 2018.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 2.

4 papers.