Tight Query Complexity Lower Bounds for PCA via Finite Sample Deformed Wigner Law
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We prove a query complexity lower bound for approximating the top r dimensional eigenspace of a matrix. We consider an oracle model where, given a symmetric matrix M ∈ ℝd × d, an algorithm mathsfAlg is allowed to make mathsfT exact queries of the form mathsfw(i) = M mathsfv(i) for i in 1,...,mathsfT, where mathsfv(i) is drawn from a distribution which depends arbitrarily on the past queries and measurements mathsfv(j),mathsfw(i)1 ≤ j ≤ i-1. We show that for every mathttgap ∈ (0,1/2], there exists a distribution over matrices M for which 1) gapr(M) = Omega(mathttgap) (where gapr(M) is the normalized gap between the r and r+1-st largest-magnitude eigenvector of M), and 2) any algorithm mathsfAlg which takes fewer than const × fracr log d√mathttgap queries fails (with overwhelming probability) to identity a matrix widehatmathsfV ∈ ℝd × r with orthonormal columns for which langle widehatmathsfV, M widehatmathsfVrangle ≥ (1 - const × mathttgap)sumi=1r λi(M). Our bound requires only that d is a small polynomial in 1/mathttgap and r, and matches the upper bounds of Musco and Musco '15. Moreover, it establishes a strict separation between convex optimization and randomized, "strict-saddle" non-convex optimization of which PCA is a canonical example: in the former, first-order methods can have dimension-free iteration complexity, whereas in PCA, the iteration complexity of gradient-based methods must necessarily grow with the dimension.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 4 Apr 2018.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 4; 2023: 3; 2024: 1; 2025: 2.
11 papers.
- 2021Streaming k-PCA: Efficient guarantees for Oja's algorithm, beyond rank-one updatescited by 21
- 2022Efficient Convex Optimization Requires Superlinear Memorycited by 14
- 2023Query lower bounds for log-concave samplingcited by 12
- 2022Low-Rank Approximation with 1/ε1/3 Matrix-Vector Productscited by 7
- 2022Optimal Query Complexities for Dynamic Trace Estimationcited by 6
- 2023Memory-Query Tradeoffs for Randomized Convex Optimizationcited by 4
- 2024Sharper Bounds for Chebyshev Moment Matching, with Applicationscited by 3
- 2023Krylov Methods are (nearly) Optimal for Low-Rank Approximationcited by 2
- 2025Simultaneous analysis of approximate leave-one-out cross-validation and mean-field inferencecited by 1
- 2022Improved analysis of randomized SVD for top-eigenvector approximationcited by 0
- 2025Query Efficient Structured Matrix Learningcited by 0
- 2025Query Efficient Structured Matrix Learning25 Jul 2025
- 2025Simultaneous analysis of approximate leave-one-out cross-validation and mean-field inference5 Jan 2025
- 2024Sharper Bounds for Chebyshev Moment Matching, with Applications22 Aug 2024
- 2023Memory-Query Tradeoffs for Randomized Convex Optimization21 Jun 2023
- 2023Krylov Methods are (nearly) Optimal for Low-Rank Approximation6 Apr 2023
- 2023Query lower bounds for log-concave sampling5 Apr 2023
- 2022Optimal Query Complexities for Dynamic Trace Estimation30 Sep 2022
- 2022Efficient Convex Optimization Requires Superlinear Memory29 Mar 2022
- 2022Improved analysis of randomized SVD for top-eigenvector approximation16 Feb 2022
- 2022Low-Rank Approximation with 1/ε1/3 Matrix-Vector Products10 Feb 2022
- 2021Streaming k-PCA: Efficient guarantees for Oja's algorithm, beyond rank-one updates6 Feb 2021