Probing Physics Knowledge Using Tools from Developmental Psychology
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In order to build agents with a rich understanding of their environment, one key objective is to endow them with a grasp of intuitive physics; an ability to reason about three-dimensional objects, their dynamic interactions, and responses to forces. While some work on this problem has taken the approach of building in components such as ready-made physics engines, other research aims to extract general physical concepts directly from sensory data. In the latter case, one challenge that arises is evaluating the learning system. Research on intuitive physics knowledge in children has long employed a violation of expectations (VOE) method to assess children's mastery of specific physical concepts. We take the novel step of applying this method to artificial learning systems. In addition to introducing the VOE technique, we describe a set of probe datasets inspired by classic test stimuli from developmental psychology. We test a baseline deep learning system on this battery, as well as on a physics learning dataset ("IntPhys") recently posed by another research group. Our results show how the VOE technique may provide a useful tool for tracking physics knowledge in future research.
Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 3 Apr 2018.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 4; 2022: 3; 2023: 3; 2024: 0; 2025: 0; 2026: 2.
12 papers.
- 2021Physion: Evaluating Physical Prediction from Vision in Humans and Machinescited by 145
- 2021AGENT: A Benchmark for Core Psychological Reasoningcited by 42
- 2022A Survey on Machine Learning Approaches for Modelling Intuitive Physicscited by 20
- 2026WorldBench: Benchmarking Physical Understanding of World Models by Isolating Physics Conceptscited by 12
- 2026PhysInOne: Visual Physics Learning and Reasoning in One Suitecited by 9
- 2021A Benchmark for Modeling Violation-of-Expectation in Physical Reasoning Across Event Categoriescited by 8
- 2023Neural Reasoning About Agents' Goals, Preferences, and Actionscited by 8
- 2022Disentangling Abstraction from Statistical Pattern Matching in Human and Machine Learningcited by 6
- 2021AVoE: A Synthetic 3D Dataset on Understanding Violation of Expectation for Artificial Cognitioncited by 4
- 2023X-VoE: Measuring eXplanatory Violation of Expectation in Physical Eventscited by 3
- 2023The Acquisition of Physical Knowledge in Generative Neural Networkscited by 3
- 2022Stochastic Gradient Descent Captures How Children Learn About Physicscited by 0
- 2026PhysInOne: Visual Physics Learning and Reasoning in One Suite10 Apr 2026
- 2026WorldBench: Benchmarking Physical Understanding of World Models by Isolating Physics Concepts29 Jan 2026
- 2023Neural Reasoning About Agents' Goals, Preferences, and Actions12 Dec 2023
- 2023The Acquisition of Physical Knowledge in Generative Neural Networks30 Oct 2023
- 2023X-VoE: Measuring eXplanatory Violation of Expectation in Physical Events21 Aug 2023
- 2022Stochastic Gradient Descent Captures How Children Learn About Physics25 Sep 2022
- 2022Disentangling Abstraction from Statistical Pattern Matching in Human and Machine Learning4 Apr 2022
- 2022A Survey on Machine Learning Approaches for Modelling Intuitive Physics14 Feb 2022
- 2021A Benchmark for Modeling Violation-of-Expectation in Physical Reasoning Across Event Categories16 Nov 2021
- 2021AVoE: A Synthetic 3D Dataset on Understanding Violation of Expectation for Artificial Cognition12 Oct 2021
- 2021Physion: Evaluating Physical Prediction from Vision in Humans and Machines15 Jun 2021
- 2021AGENT: A Benchmark for Core Psychological Reasoning24 Feb 2021